Building an Agenda – Back to Basics
Building an Agenda – Back to Basics
David Cantrick-Brooks | 27/03/2025

Agendas are a critical part of the decision-making process. One of the risks associated with building agendas is the unnecessary inclusion of items which do not actually require board attention and potentially consume time better spent on other things. Boards should review delegations of authority and charters to ensure that only items which actually require board attention are included. Boards should be focussed on the following core matters:

The front part of the agenda should include the following items:

  1. Welcome and any apologies
  2. Declarations of any changes to the register of material person interests (aka standing notice), plus any conflicts of interest that may pertain to the matters to be discussed
  3. Any late changes to the agenda (for example, as a consequence of a presenter being unavoidably delayed)

Agenda items are typically drawn from a wide range of sources, including the annual workplan, matters arising from previous minutes (aka actions register) and any specific requests received from directors and/or management.Reference to a previous agenda (at the same time of year) can be helpful, although not strictly necessary (if everything else is working as it should).

Themes in an annual board calendar could include:

* short-term and long-term

Note that the industry in which the company operates has a major bearing on agenda items – e.g. agendas for companies in the financial services industry tend to be very busy.

A board / committee meeting agenda is a roadmap for directors which outlines the items to be considered and in what order they will be discussed.It also includes the meeting's date, time, location (whether in-person, virtual or both), and the names and positions of those attending.

Committee agendas should reflect their individual charters, current workplans and prevailing issues / requests. Committees are established to assist the board by considering and making recommendations about particular matters and overseeing performance and compliance at a more granular level.All directors should not attend all committee meetings.

Allocate time for each agenda item (and stick to it!).The chair should ensure that the meeting runs smoothly and deals with all agenda items, encouraging contributions from every director (especially those who tend to be passive or reserved).

“Agenda creep”, where the agenda grows as new items are added but nothing comes off, is an issue for many boards.Boards should also be conscious of the amount of time spent looking back versus looking forward (strategy), with an emphasis on the latter.

Agendas are typically discussed and agreed between the secretary, relevant chair (board and committee), CEO and/or another responsible executive (in the case of committees).This can be a very time-consuming process and require many iterations, so start early!

The agenda-setting process can vary greatly depending on the organisation and the ways that things have been done in the past (for better or worse).Change can be difficult!

Papers should be clear and concise to ensure that the key issues are appropriately identified and addressed.More about this in a future blog.

Finally, it should be noted that agenda-building (and related) software is available to improve, streamline and automate manual processes.

NEED HELP?If you require assistance with creating an industry or sector-specific agenda for your organisation, or would like assistance to improve your current agenda(s), please contact us.We can also assist you in choosing and implementing an appropriate software solution – something appropriate for your organisation.

Additional Reading

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/balancedscorecard.asp

General Disclaimer:

The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter.

No person(s) should act, or refrain from acting, solely on the basis of the material contained on this website. Your access of this website, and any use that you may make of the information on it, is not intended to create, and your use does not constitute, a contractual relationship of any kind.

All material published by Governance in Action Pty Ltd on its website remains its property, with copyright attached, and all rights are reserved.

PreviousNext

Related Articles

Governance Audits in Australia: What Boards Can Learn from the Public Sector

Governance frameworks can look impressive on paper. The more important question is whether they work in practice. This article examines governance audits as evidence-based assessments of the design, operation and outcomes of an organisation’s governance arrangements. It considers why governance assurance is more formalised and visible in the Australian public sector, why private-sector organisations often perform equivalent work under different labels, and what boards can learn from each approach. It also explores appropriate audit scope, culture and behavioural evidence, review frequency, the role of internal and external reviewers, and the opportunities and risks associated with using AI. The central message is simple: good governance assurance should go beyond confirming that policies, charters and controls exist. It should test whether they are understood, used, effective and capable of identifying and correcting governance weaknesses before they become larger problems.

08/18/2026

Lead and Lag Indicators in Corporate Governance: From Rear-View Reporting to Early Warning

Boards need more than a rear-view mirror. Lagging indicators such as breaches, losses, incidents and missed targets remain essential for accountability, but well-designed leading indicators can provide earlier warning of changing risk, culture, capability and control conditions. This article examines what lead and lag indicators actually mean in corporate governance, why the same measure can sometimes be both, and why “leading” should not automatically be equated with “predictive”. It proposes a practical indicator framework across strategy, risk and compliance, culture, WHS, board effectiveness, internal audit, technology, data, customers and third parties. It also considers how big data, analytics and AI can strengthen governance – provided boards first address data quality, privacy, context and assurance. The objective is not perfect prediction, but earlier recognition, better questions and better-informed board decisions.

08/13/2026